If I have perverted addictions which I cant kick, does that mean Im guaranteed to go to hell? (2024)

>sola scriptura
Yet the ignore half their book. The foundation and most important part, the part where God himself speaks and gives his laws and commands and tells you what he approves and disapproves of, that whole part they ignore.

The God of the Old Testament and the God of the New Testament are two different Gods.

If he was God we would have said, thank you.

Since when did God say thank you?

So God cannot say thank you? Yet Jesus has said thank you so then Jesus is not God.

Show me anywhere in the Old Testament which is the place where God himself speaks in first person, where God himself appears and is the main character and his own words are recorded, anywhere in there, anything that justifies the belief that God is divided into three separate entities.

I don't recall hearing of any Christian ever God being three separate entities,
1 John 5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."
Genesis 1:26-27 "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."
You could also look into the weird phenomenon of God being referenced in the third person in an illogical way (if you don't consider the fact that God is multiple persons in one essence) like Genesis 2:3, Genesis 9:16, etc.

>cherubs
seraphim*

Whether God is talking to the angels or not, God refers to Himself as multiple, compare
"Let us" "created he"
"our likeness" "his own image"
God (YHVH) is the Father, the Son/Word/Jesus, and the Holy Spirit

Funny how Elohim is a plural of Eloah and sometimes Eloah is used to refer to God. Idk how you can misunderstand how "Let us" and "created he" and "our likeness" and "his own image" literally refers solely to God Himself in the plural and then solely to Him in the singular, unless you cannot/aren't willing to accept it. I never said that YHVH means God, that's the name of the Trinitarian God

"Let US (plural) make"* "created HE (singular)"
"OUR (plural) likeness" "HIS (singular) own image"

1 Corinthians 15:27-28
27 For he “has put everything under his feet.” Now when it says that “everything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. 28 When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all.

So then how can they be equal?

If Elohim was referring to a father God and a son God then the term Benei Elohim, which means the Sons of God, would make no sense.

OK but what’s my hom*osexual masturbatory habits got to do with that, I am just trying to pass the time and experience some real dopamine for once in my life.

I asked God and He said it’s bad how I live but I have salvation regardless through faith in Jesus because no one is without sin and Christ’s finished work on the cross buys me out of hell.

stop answering for me

>Why not ask him yourself
>He is the judge, not me
you think there's no indication regarding this in the Bible text at all?

The Bible is basically vague on the degree to which someone can keep sinning. In some parts it says that people with Jesus sin no more, and we need to show our faith by changing or else our faith isn’t real, and in other parts it talks about how continuing in sin is inevitable and anyone who says they are without sin is a liar. In the end I suppose it just comes down to the extent to which you believe Jesus’ word.

It’s not a license to sin, but if ever we do find ourself in sin, it’s a license to not have to despair.

do you think David is heaven or hell?

*In heaven or hell

>None of us will be judged based on our actions but by our hearts.
moronic take, it's our actions which shape both our lives and the world around us. By your logic, murdering someone is A-ok if you cry to your imaginary israeli friend about it afterwards. By contrast, if you do nothing but help others all day for no personal gain but seethe at them in your head, then you're a sinner and deserve hell. Anyone who sincerely believes that is either incredibly naive or an evil person seeking permission to commit more evil.

I agree that killing a tyrant is self defense, but the ideology which prioritizes thought crime over real crime is going to create more tyrants, murderers and pedophiles than one which doesn't.

Intent requires thought, stop trying to dodge the real questions with semantics.
>Helping others is good.
>Violence is not good.
So then you concede acts matter, you just want to add intent so you can get the feeling of doing good by just talking to your imaginary friend instead of actually doing the work to help people, and the additional high of judging those who ACTUALLY help harshly because they'd rather do that than fella*te some imaginary dead israelite all day.